What It Is
Risk Parity is an allocation strategy designed to ensure that each asset or model contributes an equal share of risk to the total portfolio. Unlike traditional methods that allocate capital evenly or based on expected return, Risk Parity focuses on balancing volatility contributions—typically leading to more stable and diversified results.
What It Does in Fincanva
Logic: Allocates more capital to low-volatility components and less to high-volatility ones, such that the contribution of each to total portfolio risk is equal
Simulation Behavior: At each rebalance, asset or model volatilities and their correlations are used to compute allocations through a quadratic programming optimization process
Pros
Equalizes risk exposure across components
Reduces concentration in high-volatility positions
Often results in more stable, lower-drawdown performance
Aligns with institutional practices used by large asset managers and pension funds
Cons
May allocate substantial capital to low-risk, low-return assets
Requires accurate volatility and correlation data
Can result in leverage if implemented with low-risk assets
Computationally intensive compared to simpler methods
Where You Can Use It
Portfolios: Yes - Positive weights only
Models: Yes
When to Use It
Best when seeking balance in risk, not capital
Ideal for diversified, multi-asset strategies
Useful when managing exposure across uncorrelated or variably volatile components
Suitable for institutional-style strategies aiming for long-term consistency
Example If Asset A has high volatility and Asset B is more stable, Risk Parity will assign less capital to Asset A and more to Asset B—so that both contribute the same amount of risk, even though their capital allocations differ.
Plan Access
Portfolios: Available on Ultimate and Professional plans
Models: Available on Ultimate and Professional plans
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article